Case 2500487/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Hardy v Absolute Services (North East) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500487/2019
- Decision date
- 21 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Hardy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that Absolute Services (North East) Limited unilaterally reduced her hours of work from 30 each week to 18 each week, with her weekly pay falling from £244.80 to £153.00. The resulting loss of £91.80 per week continued for 15 weeks, from 27 August 2018 until her resignation on 7 December 2018, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,377.00, calculated by reference to gross pay. The judgment states that any income tax and employee national insurance liability on that sum was the claimant's responsibility, and that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It treated her resignation as a dismissal within section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996, on the basis that she had terminated the contract without notice in response to the respondent's conduct, and held that dismissal unfair under sections 94 and 98 of the Act. Compensation for that claim was fixed at £1,268.00, made up of a basic award of £918.00, calculated as 6 x £153.00, and a compensatory award of £350.00 for loss of statutory rights only, because no other loss was found to have been suffered as a consequence of the dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unilaterally reduced the claimant's weekly hours from 30 to 18, reducing pay from £244.80 to £153.00 per week. The unlawful deductions were calculated at £91.80 per week for 15 weeks from 27 August 2018 to 7 December 2018. | Upheld | — | £1,377 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed within s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996 when she resigned in response to the respondent's conduct, and that the dismissal was unfair under ss.94 and 98 ERA 1996. Compensation was limited to loss of statutory rights because no other loss was proved. | Upheld | — | £1,268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,645
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £918
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £350
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Sections 94 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.