Case 2500498/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Oakley v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500498/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Oakley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by video at Newcastle on 18 August 2021 before Employment Judge Moss. The claimant was Mr C Oakley and the respondent was Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Limited.
The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. It also held that the claim described as wrongful dismissal/dismissal in breach of contract was not well founded and dismissed it.
The judgment records that the hearing was remote because of the Covid-19 pandemic and that the parties did not object to that format. No monetary remedy was awarded, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim of wrongful dismissal/dismissal in breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.