Case 2500500/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Longstaff v Core Cover Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500500/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
- Panel members
- Mr S Wykes, Ms E Wiles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Longstaff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Teesside Justice Centre on 2 September 2019 before Employment Judge S A Shore with non-legal members Mr S Wykes and Ms E Wiles, gave a unanimous judgment in Miss C Longstaff's case against Core Cover Ltd.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal, and her claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was also dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not set out further findings on those withdrawn claims.
The claimant's claim of discrimination for the protected reason of pregnancy and/or maternity succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,000.00 for injury to feelings and £233.33 in interest, making a total award of £5,233.33.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Tribunal awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings plus £233.33 interest. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £5,233 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,233
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.