Case 2500504/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Cryan v Elite Health & Fitness Sunderland Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500504/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Cryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Cryan was employed by Elite Health & Fitness Sunderland Ltd from 1 October 2010 until 21 December 2019, when her employment ended without notice by reason of redundancy. The claim form sought a redundancy payment and damages for notice pay, and the reasons record that the proceedings were served on the respondent, an extension for response was granted to 14 May 2020, and no response was filed. The tribunal therefore proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the available material.
At a telephone preliminary hearing on 12 June 2020, the tribunal discussed the claims and the amounts claimed with the claimant's representative. It found that at dismissal the claimant had 9 complete years' service over the age of 41 and gross weekly pay of £119, which produced a statutory redundancy payment of £1,606.50. It also found that she had accrued 16 days of untaken holiday, calculated the entitlement as 44 hours at £10.82 per hour, and awarded £476.08 under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations.
The tribunal was satisfied that the employment ended by reason of redundancy without notice and without payment of outstanding holiday pay. It therefore upheld the breach of contract complaint for failure to give 9 weeks' notice and awarded damages of £1,071. The total amount ordered to be paid to the claimant was £3,153.58.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found the claimant had 9 complete years' service over the age of 41 and gross weekly pay of £119, producing a redundancy payment of £1,606.50. | Upheld | — | £1,607 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded under Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations. The tribunal found 16 days of untaken holiday accrued, calculated as 44 hours at £10.82 per hour. | Upheld | — | £476 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for the failure to give 9 weeks' notice. The reasons section also refers to this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £1,071 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,154
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.