Case 2500507/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wilkinson v Organon Pharma (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500507/2021
- Decision date
- 2 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Decision
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Wilkinson was employed by Organon Pharma (UK) Ltd from 16 March 1998 until 14 December 2020. He presented his claim on 23 April 2021, describing it as unfair constructive dismissal. The claim was served on the Respondent, but no response was presented by the deadline of 27 May 2021.
Applying Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the Employment Judge considered the material available and was satisfied there was sufficient information to determine liability. The judgment records that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The Judge also noted that more information was required before remedy could be decided, so the hearing listed for 19 August 2021 was converted into a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim form is described as alleging unfair constructive dismissal, but the judgment records and determines the complaint as unfair dismissal and finds it well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.