Case 2500513/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Shotton v All Saints Construction (in compulsory liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500513/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Shotton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Shotton brought claims against All Saints Construction Limited for a redundancy payment, notice pay, accrued holiday pay, and unauthorised deduction of wages. Employment Judge Arullendran heard the case remotely by CVP on 5 July 2022. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the redundancy payment claim under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and dismissed it. The claim for notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also dismissed as not well-founded.
The tribunal further dismissed the claim for accrued holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment does not give separate reasons beyond recording that the claim was not well-founded.
The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £27,499.98 gross, with the claimant liable for any tax and national insurance contributions on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The award was stated to be gross, with tax and national insurance payable as applicable. | Upheld | — | £27,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.