Case 2500532/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Nadine Reay v SGS United Kingdom Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500532/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Nadine Reay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely by CVP at Newcastle CFCTC on 24 June 2024 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by Miss Amy Smith, counsel. The judgment records that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested one, and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing.
The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance; no merits findings were made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.