Case 2500535/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Lewis Louttit v Severfield (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500535/2021
- Decision date
- 17 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lewis Louttit
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well founded and awarded the claimant a basic award and a compensatory award. The written record states the basic award as £2.421 and the compensatory award as £300, and the total amount ordered was £2,721.
The tribunal also found the complaint of wrongful dismissal well founded, but recorded that all of the claimant's losses had been offset by other earnings, so there was no award of damages for that complaint. The judgment was given at a remote hearing on 10 and 11 November 2021 and the written record is dated 17 November 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states a basic award of £2.421 and a compensatory award of £300; the stated total of £2,721 indicates the basic award was intended to be £2,421. | Upheld | — | £2,721 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well founded and succeeded, but recorded that all of the claimant's losses were offset by other earnings, so no damages were awarded. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,721
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,421
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.