Case 2500542/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Easdon v Mark Swatts Morse LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500542/2024
- Decision date
- 28 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Easdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Loy, sitting alone at Newcastle by CVP on 17 June 2024, found that Mr A Easdon’s claims for a statutory redundancy payment, unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages and unpaid notice pay were all well founded and succeeded. The respondent was Mark Swatts Morse LLP. The judgment does not set out separate substantive reasons for each head of claim beyond recording that each was well founded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total gross sum of £15,019.40. That total was made up of a statutory redundancy payment of £7,946.84, unpaid wages for January 2024 of £1,752.00, unpaid holiday pay of £430.20, and unpaid notice pay of £4,890.36. The decision records the calculations used for each figure and does not identify any additional award for interest or any other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,947 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £430 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,752 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,890 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.