Case 2500544/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Walker v Mark Swatts Morse LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500544/2024
- Decision date
- 28 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Loy, sitting alone at Newcastle by CVP on 17 June 2024, held that the claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded. The judgment also records that the claimant's claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid wages succeeded, and that the claim for unpaid pension contributions was withdrawn.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total gross sum of £9,045.47. The award was broken down as a statutory redundancy payment of £7,269.22, unpaid wages for 14 days calculated at £101.50 gross per day from an annual salary of £27,000.00, producing £1,421.05, and unpaid holiday pay of 24.1 hours at £11.28 gross per hour, producing £355.20.
The extracted reasons do not set out any further detailed findings beyond the outcome and the arithmetic used to calculate the award. No separate compensation for injury to feelings or interest is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment records a statutory redundancy payment claim. | Upheld | — | £7,269 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment records unpaid holiday pay; mapped to the holiday_pay category. | Upheld | — | £355 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment records unpaid wages; mapped to unlawful_deduction_wages. | Upheld | — | £1,421 |
| Other | Judgment records that the claim for unpaid pension contributions was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.