Case 2500545/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Webb v Mark Swatts Morse LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500545/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Loy, sitting alone at Newcastle by CVP on 17 June 2024, heard the claimant Mrs S Webb in person against the respondent Mark Swatts Morse LLP, represented by Ms A Swatt, solicitor. The tribunal found that the claimant's claims for a statutory redundancy payment, unpaid holiday pay, and unpaid wages were each well founded and succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total gross sum of £7,498.62. This comprised a statutory redundancy payment of £4,787.16, unpaid wages totalling £2,458.50 (88.5 hours in January 2024 and 48 hours in February 2024, at £18.00 gross per hour), and unpaid holiday pay totalling £252.96 (4 days in January and 2 days in February at £42.16 gross per day).
The judgment text available is brief and does not set out further reasoning, legal tests, or analysis beyond the calculations of the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment found well founded. | Upheld | — | £4,787 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay: 4 days in January and 2 days in February at £42.16 gross per day. | Upheld | — | £253 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages: 88.5 hours in January 2024 and 48 hours in February 2024 at £18.00 gross per hour. The judgment text records the February component as 'February 2024 @ £18.00 gross per hour = 864.00', summed to £2,458.50. | Upheld | — | £2,459 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,499
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.