Case 2500545/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Paul Coglan v Corby Croft Coatings Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500545/2025
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Salter Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Paul Coglan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle by Employment Judge Salter on 14 August 2025, via CVP. The claimant, Paul Coglan, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Corby Croft Coatings Limited, was represented by its directors, Mr R. Woodhouse and Mr S. Mcleod.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had less than two years' continuity of service. It therefore did not find that the statutory unfair dismissal claim could succeed on the facts before it.
The tribunal also found that the wrongful dismissal claim failed and dismissed it. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant had less than two years' continuity of service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal stated that the wrongful dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.