Mr J Raspin v ADML Transport Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2500554/2023
Decision date: 15 May 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Arullendran Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Raspin

Respondent

ADML Transport Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr J Raspin brought a claim against ADML Transport Limited for unauthorised deduction of wages in the sum of £1,250. The respondent was required to file a response by 11 May 2023 but failed to do so.

The tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment on the basis of the information provided on the ET1 form. It found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded and successful.

The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,250, subject to any statutory deductions the respondent may be obliged to make. No separate award components were identified in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment; respondent did not file a response. The judgment records the claim as an unauthorised deduction of wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.	Upheld	—	£1,250

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,250; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.