Case 2500564/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Callie Best (2) Angela Beaston (3) Natasha Beaston (4) Jennifer Post (5) Brian Green As Trustees of Gateway North East (a registered charity) v Mr A Wright (Temporary Administrator) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500564/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Callie Best (2) Angela Beaston (3) Natasha Beaston (4) Jennifer Post (5) Brian Green As Trustees of Gateway North East (a registered charity)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claimants' employer contract claims at a hearing on 11 August 2023 before Employment Judge Aspden. The claimants were represented by Ms Fearn and the respondent appeared in person.
The judgment states that the employer contract claims were struck out under rule 37 because they had no reasonable prospect of success. No monetary award was made. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claimants' employer contract claims under rule 37 on the ground that they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.