Case 2500568/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v CREST (Compact for Race Equality Tyneside) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500568/2025
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the third claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim because it found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The reason given was that the third claimant acknowledged she did not have the requisite two years' service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
At the preliminary hearing, the first and second claimants confirmed that they were not pursuing complaints of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected interest disclosures. Those complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The third claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction, as she acknowledged she did not have two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The first and second claimants withdrew complaints of automatic unfair dismissal for making protected interest disclosures. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.