Case 2500585/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Rowley & Miss B Myers v Jacob Bordon — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500585/2025
- Decision date
- 15 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Rowley & Miss B Myers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimants on 15 November 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim. The stated reasons were that the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 September 2025 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
Employment Judge Childe was satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claims under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied, and that striking out the claims was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The claims were therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment states that the claims were struck out under Rule 38 after non-compliance with a Tribunal order and because the claims had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not set out separate pleaded claim details beyond the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.