Case 2500593/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Cato v Ahmed Sayed — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500593/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Cato
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. The claimant was Mr K Cato and the respondent was Ahmed Sayed. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 7 September 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Johnson held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type or make findings on the merits of any pleaded cause of action.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.