Case 2500596/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms A Blevins (2) My Pet HQ Limited v My Pet HQ Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500596/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Ms A Blevins (2) My Pet HQ Limited
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone at North Shields on 7 November 2019 before Employment Judge Morris, determined Ms Blevins's Working Time Regulations claim and the parties' contract claims. The judgment records that the claimant's claim under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, for compensation representing holiday accrued but untaken at the termination of her employment, was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms Blevins £433.15. It recorded that the sum was calculated by reference to the claimant's gross pay and that any liability to income tax or employee's national insurance contributions was the claimant's alone.
The claimant's contract claim, described as a claim that the respondent had not paid her in respect of any period of notice, was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed by consent. The respondent's contract counterclaim was also withdrawn on behalf of the respondent and dismissed by consent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claimant's regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998 claim for payment in respect of holiday accrued but untaken at termination was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £433 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's contract claim for unpaid notice pay was withdrawn by the claimant and, by consent, dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract counterclaim was withdrawn on behalf of the respondent and, by consent, dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £433
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £433
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.