Case 2500601/2024 · Employment Tribunal
1. 2. Ms P Croft Ms J Friar v Prime Labels Retail Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500601/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. 2. Ms P Croft Ms J Friar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Newcastle by CVP on 26 June 2024 before Employment Judge Jeram. The respondent, Prime Labels Retail Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), did not attend. The judgment states that both claimants' claims for unauthorised deduction from wages were well founded.
The tribunal awarded Ms P Croft £337.05 gross and Ms J Friar £709.92 gross. No separate breakdown of the awards beyond those sums is given in the written record, and no other remedy components are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found Ms P Croft's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and awarded £337.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £337 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found Ms J Friar's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and awarded £709.92 gross. | Upheld | — | £710 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,047
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.