Case 2500605/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Robinson v Inndependance Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500605/2024
- Decision date
- 12 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Robinson brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim after there was confusion about the identity of her former employer. The claim was first presented against The Brewers Arms, then amended to Inndependence Ltd and re-served. No response was filed, and the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, being satisfied that it had enough information to determine the claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed from 23 May 2023 to 31 January 2024 as a bar person, working on average 12 hours a week at £10.50 an hour. It accepted the documentary material she provided, including text exchanges, a diary of hours worked, a redacted bank statement showing the respondent as responsible for paying wages, and evidence of travel undertaken to try to recover the money owed.
On the evidence before it, the tribunal found that 12.5 hours at the end of the employment had not been paid, producing wages properly payable of £131.25. It therefore held that the unlawful deduction of wages claim was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum.
The tribunal also accepted that the claimant had incurred £25 in travel costs trying to recover the unpaid wages. Relying on section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it ordered that additional amount to compensate her for financial loss attributable to the deduction. The tribunal stated that it had no power to make an award of interest.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file a response after the amended claim was re-served. The tribunal found that 12.5 hours of work remained unpaid at £10.50 per hour, making £131.25 properly payable, and also awarded £25 for travel costs under section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £156 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £156
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £25
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.