Case 2500608/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Ancrum v Central Paving Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500608/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Ancrum
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 May 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr G Ancrum an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Arullendran struck out the claim on 22 May 2023. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the pleaded employment claims beyond that strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate out any individual breach-of-contract allegation; it states that the claim as a whole was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate out any individual unlawful deduction from wages allegation; it states that the claim as a whole was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.