Case 2500640/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Noble Respondent Asda Stores Ltd v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500640/2025
- Decision date
- 3 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Teesside
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr I Noble Respondent Asda Stores Ltd
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr I Noble, brought complaints about the handling of his flexible working request against Asda Stores Ltd. The tribunal recorded that he alleged the request was refused on an impermissible ground and that the respondent failed to notify him of the decision within the relevant decision period, contrary to ss.80G(1)(aa) and (b).
The Employment Judge held that those complaints were not well founded and dismissed them. No remedy was awarded and no separate monetary figure was recorded for any part of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | The claimant alleged that the respondent refused his flexible working request on an impermissible ground and failed to notify him of the decision within the relevant decision period, contrary to ss.80G(1)(aa) and (b). | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss.80G(1)(aa) and (b)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.