Case 2500659/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Pour v Mr K Kasaei and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500659/2024
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Pour
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle CFCTC by CVP on 29 January 2025 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The claimant appeared in person, the first respondent appeared, and the second respondent did not attend. The tribunal’s written judgment records that the claimant’s claims against both respondents were not well-founded and were dismissed.
The written record does not provide further factual findings or legal reasoning, and no monetary remedy was awarded. It also states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The written record does not set out the substantive allegations; it states only that the claimant’s claims against both respondents were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.