Case 2500670/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Anderson v Goddess Beauty Boutique — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500670/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 August 2022 Employment Judge Aspden struck out the claimant's case against Goddess Beauty Boutique. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 25 July 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 14 September 2022 was vacated. The judgment records no findings on the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not specify distinct heads of claim in the text provided. The claim was struck out for not being actively pursued after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.