Case 2500675/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jewitt v New Era Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500675/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Newcastle, sitting on 6 June 2024 before Employment Judge Newburn, found that the Claimant was dismissed on 31 January 2024 by reason of redundancy. The Respondent did not attend the hearing and the Claimant appeared in person.
The Claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded, and the Respondent was ordered to pay £1,923.08. The Claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages for January 2024 was also found to be well founded and succeeded, with the Respondent ordered to pay a gross sum of £1,283.33.
The total award made by the Tribunal was £3,206.41. Written reasons were not provided as reasons were given orally at the hearing; the judgment notes that written reasons would only follow upon a request made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered following dismissal on 31 January 2024 by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £1,923 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for unpaid wages relating to January 2024; claimant liable to HMRC for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £1,283 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,206
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.