Case 2500691/2024 · Employment Tribunal
D Ford v COREISP Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500691/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Ford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Newcastle, sitting by video on 17 June 2024 before Employment Judge Aspden, amended the respondent's name to COREISP Group Limited. The judgment records that the claimant, D Ford, was represented by his wife and the respondent by its company secretary.
The only substantive claim determined was that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 30 November 2023. The tribunal found that claim well founded.
As a remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the outstanding wages of £1,383.75. No separate findings on interest, injury to feelings, or any other heads of loss were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages on 30 November 2023 was well founded and ordered payment of the outstanding wages. | Upheld | — | £1,384 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,384
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.