Case 2500701/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Bailey v Regent Decorators Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500701/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented his ET1 on 20 May 2022. The tribunal sent the claim to Regent Decorators Limited on 27 May 2022 and the respondent did not file a response by 24 June 2022. The judgment was therefore entered without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, on the basis of the information provided by the claimant.
The tribunal recorded that Mr B Bailey was employed from 1 June 2004 to 28 April 2022 and was earning £460 gross per week. He was 57 years old when his employment ended. For the redundancy payment, the tribunal applied the statutory calculation under sections 148 and 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that he was entitled to 3 years at £460 and 16 years at 1.5 times £460, producing a redundancy payment of £12,420.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice, which had not been paid. Notice pay was calculated at £460 per week for 12 weeks, giving £5,520 gross. The judgment therefore made a total award of £17,940, comprising £12,420 redundancy pay and £5,520 notice pay, with the notice pay expressed as a gross award subject to tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment pursuant to sections 148 and 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £12,420 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded and awarded as gross notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,940
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- sections 148 and 162 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.