Case 2500706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Oliver v Mark Swatts Morse LLP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500706/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Oliver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Loy, sitting alone at Newcastle by CVP on 17 June 2024, considered three claims brought by Miss K Oliver against Mark Swatts Morse LLP. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms A Swatt, solicitor.
The Tribunal found each of the three claims well founded and they succeeded: a statutory redundancy payment claim, a claim for unpaid holiday pay, and a claim for unpaid wages. The judgment was reserved with reasons under rule 61.
On remedy, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total gross sum of £4,178.15, comprising a statutory redundancy payment of £3,230.78, unpaid wages of £812.03 (9 days at £90.22 gross per day), and unpaid holiday pay of £135.34 (1.5 days at £90.22 gross per day).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment claim found well founded. | Upheld | — | £3,231 |
| Holiday pay | 1.5 days unpaid holiday pay at £90.22 gross per day. | Upheld | — | £135 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 9 days unpaid wages at £90.22 gross per day. | Upheld | — | £812 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,178
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.