Case 2500712/2022 · Employment Tribunal
H Boyes v The Prestige Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500712/2022
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Boyes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, H Boyes, did not attend the hearing on 9 August 2022. The reasons record that a call made to the claimant's telephone number that day was terminated when the tribunal clerk identified himself.
The tribunal then sent an order requiring the claimant to explain why he had not attended the hearing and why he had not informed the respondent and the tribunal that he did not intend to attend. The order warned that if he did not comply, or did not adequately comply, his claim could be struck out for failure to comply with an Employment Tribunal order or for failing to actively pursue his claim, and required a response by 16 August 2022.
By 2 September 2022, the claimant had not responded at all to the order. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim for failing to comply with the Employment Tribunal order and/or failing to actively pursue the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records only that the claim was struck out for failing to comply with an Employment Tribunal order and/or failing to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.