Case 2500723/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Bickerton v Minories G Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500723/2023
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Bickerton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Bickerton brought a complaint under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 seeking payment in lieu of accrued and untaken holiday pay under regulation 14(2). The respondent did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Sweeney heard the case remotely at Newcastle on 29 June 2023 and gave oral reasons at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the complaint had not been presented within the three-month period beginning with the date the payment should have been made. It was also not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time, or that it was presented within a reasonable period thereafter. The proceedings were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim was brought under regulation 30 WTR for an amount in lieu of accrued and untaken holiday pay due under regulation 14(2) WTR. It was dismissed because it was not presented within the three-month time limit, and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time or that it was presented within a reasonable period thereafter. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- regulation 30 WTR 1998
- regulation 14(2) WTR
- three-month limitation period
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.