Case 2500723/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Poulter v Jensen’s Cooperage Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2500723/2025
- Decision date
- 2 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Poulter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Poulter, and the respondent, Jensen’s Cooperage Limited, did not appear and were not represented at the hearing before Employment Judge L Robertson at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 2 June 2026.
The tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not record findings on the merits of any underlying complaint and does not identify the specific claim type within the judgment text.
No remedy was awarded or assessed. The judgment records that summary reasons were given orally and that written summary reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The PDF text does not identify the specific claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.