Case 2500724/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Rodman v Aspins Bakery Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500724/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Rodman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Newcastle on 8 December 2022 before Employment Judge Aspden, with no attendance from either party, the tribunal determined the claimant's claims on the basis of the material supplied. It held that Mr N Rodman was entitled to a redundancy payment, but the amount could not be determined from the limited information provided.
The tribunal also found a deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because wages due in or around February 2022 had not been paid. It ordered the respondent to pay the amount deducted, although the extracted judgment does not state the figure.
The holiday pay complaint was dismissed. The tribunal further held that Mr Rodman was unfairly dismissed, but made no award of compensation for unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment, but said the amount could not be determined on the limited information supplied by the claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a deduction from wages in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, arising from wages due in or around February 2022 not being paid. The judgment orders the respondent to pay the amount deducted, but no figure is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint in respect of holiday pay was not made out and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but expressly awarded no compensation for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.