Case 2500724/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Simms v Jensen’s Cooperage Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2500724/2025
- Decision date
- 2 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Simms
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 2 June 2026 before Employment Judge L Robertson, neither Mr A Simms nor Jensen’s Cooperage Limited appeared or was represented. The written judgment records a single operative decision: the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment does not identify the individual pleaded causes of action or make findings on unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, unlawful deductions from wages, or any other substantive claim. No compensation, redundancy payment, wage award, interest, or other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. It does not identify the specific causes of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.