Case 2500736/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hunter v Intelligent Steel Solutions Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500736/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hunter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Hunter's claim against Intelligent Steel Solutions Limited (in voluntary liquidation) was heard at Newcastle CFCTC by CVP on 4 July 2023 before Employment Judge Loy. Neither party appeared or was represented at the hearing.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not responded to the Tribunal's letter of 14 June 2023 asking whether he intended to make a claim from the Redundancy Payment Service in light of the respondent's insolvency, had not responded to the Tribunal's later correspondence, and had not responded to the strike-out warning sent on 26 June 2023 by the ordered deadline of 3 July 2023 or at all. The claimant also did not attend the final hearing and gave no forewarning or explanation for his non-attendance.
In those circumstances, the tribunal struck out the whole of the claimant's claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the whole claim for not being actively pursued and did not distinguish a separate outcome for this category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment struck out the whole claim for not being actively pursued and did not distinguish a separate outcome for this category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the whole claim for not being actively pursued and did not distinguish a separate outcome for this category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the whole claim for not being actively pursued and did not distinguish a separate outcome for this category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.