Case 2500737/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Foggon v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500737/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Foggon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge decided the complaint could be determined on the available material. The administrators had given consent for the claim to continue.
The Tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Low Prudhoe Industrial Estate site, and that the claimant was an affected employee dismissed as redundant on that date. It found there was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employees, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes because the respondent did not invite an election.
The Tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 consultation requirements and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it found there had been no consultation and no mitigating circumstances, and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 189 TULRCA 1992 for alleged failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements; taxonomy has no specific protective award category. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.