Case 2500739/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Adamson v Paragon Group UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500739/2023
- Decision date
- 4 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Adamson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Adamson's claim against Paragon Group UK Ltd. The reasons recorded that, by an order dated 23 August 2023, the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out after he failed to attend or be represented at the case management preliminary hearing on 23 August 2023 and failed to respond to the tribunal's emails of 11 August 2023 asking whether he wished to withdraw the claim.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Sweeney stated that the claim was struck out on 4 September 2023. The extracted decision contains no findings on the merits of any underlying substantive claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive cause or causes of action. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not attend or be represented at the case management preliminary hearing on 23 August 2023, did not respond to the tribunal's emails of 11 August 2023, and did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.