Case 2500759/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Penswick v Gaming Venues Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500759/2024
- Decision date
- 6 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Johnson Representation
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Penswick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Teesside Justice Hearing Centre on 5 December 2024 before Employment Judge G Johnson. The claimant attended in person, assisted by a support worker, and the respondent did not attend and was not represented. Written reasons were not provided with the judgment.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £125.04 net in respect of wages unlawfully deducted, with the respondent responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions. The complaint of breach of contract was also well founded, with the respondent ordered to pay £2,025 by way of damages. The complaint of unlawful disability discrimination was well founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £5,450 in compensation.
The total sum ordered to be paid by the respondent to the claimant was £7,600.04.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net amount; respondent responsible for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £125 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,025 |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | £5,450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.