Case 2500779/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mackay v Barrier Traffic Management Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500779/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzpatrick Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mackay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Mackay, brought a claim against Barrier Traffic Management Limited for unlawful deduction of wages. The matter was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal by video on 7 October 2022 before Employment Judge Fitzpatrick sitting alone.
The tribunal's only substantive decision was that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages was not well founded and was dismissed. No separate monetary award was made, and the written record does not identify any sum in respect of the claim.
The record notes that the hearing was remote, that no party objected to that format, and that a face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and no-one requested one. It also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.