Case 2500787/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Clayton v SGF Newcastle Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500787/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Clayton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr P Clayton's claim against SGF Newcastle Ltd under rule 37. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 23 July 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Johnson ordered that the claim be struck out on 18 August 2020. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text; the listing category supplied with the case is unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.