Case 2500790/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Miss K Campbell v Home Group Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2500790/2024
Decision date: 10 May 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Heather REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss K Campbell

Respondent

Home Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a public preliminary hearing in Newcastle by CVP on 10 May 2024, before Employment Judge Heather, the tribunal refused Miss Campbell's application for interim relief against Home Group Limited. The written record states that the hearing was a public preliminary hearing and that reasons were given orally at the hearing.

The tribunal also held that the claimant's automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was correctly made and would proceed. The judgment does not determine the merits of that claim at this stage and records no monetary award.

The record further states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written decision.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Application for interim relief refused at the public preliminary hearing.	Dismissed	—	—
Whistleblowing	Automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was held to have been correctly made and was allowed to proceed; the merits were not determined at this hearing.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.