Case 2500797/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Ashford v Grecon Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500797/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Panel members
- Mr P Curtis, Mrs S Don
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Ashford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Ashford presented claims on 12 May 2021 for unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £750.01 and unlawful disability discrimination against Grecon Limited. The case was listed for final hearing on 6 to 8 December 2022, following several case management hearings and orders for disclosure, inspection, an agreed bundle, and exchange of witness statements.
By the hearing date, the claimant had not attended and had not complied with the orders requiring disclosure and witness statements. The respondent applied to strike out the claims on 15 November 2022 on the grounds of breach of tribunal orders and non-pursuit. The claimant sought postponements, relying on medical evidence about anxiety, but the tribunal found the evidence did not clearly show that he was unfit to attend and was not sufficient to justify a late postponement.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not properly set out his disability discrimination case. It observed that the reasonable adjustments point appeared to be limited to a preference for receiving negative feedback at the end of the working day, and that any possible section 15 Equality Act 2010 allegation had still not been properly articulated. The tribunal found there was no meaningful or acceptable explanation for the failure to comply with the disclosure and witness statement orders, and that the proceedings had not been actively pursued.
Applying Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution of Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal struck out and dismissed both the unlawful disability discrimination complaint and the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint. No remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out and dismissed the unlawful disability discrimination complaint under Rule 37. It noted the claimant had not properly set out the case, including that the reasonable adjustments point appeared to be only a preference for negative feedback at the end of the working day, and that any section 15 Equality Act 2010 allegation had still not been properly pleaded. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out and dismissed the unauthorised deduction from wages claim, which had been pleaded in the sum of £750.01, because the claimant had failed to comply with orders and was not actively pursuing the proceedings. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution of Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Overriding Objective
- Presidential Guidance on seeking a postponement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.