Case 2500798/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs Emma Brannigan (2) Mr Rhys Brannigan v Opium Investments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500798/2023
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs Emma Brannigan (2) Mr Rhys Brannigan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Newcastle on 7 July 2023 before Employment Judge Sweeney. Both claimants, Mrs Emma Brannigan and Mr Rhys Brannigan, appeared in person. The respondent, Opium Investments Limited, did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the claims were well founded and succeeded in respect of unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996, payment of holiday pay under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998, and wrongful dismissal (notice pay).
For Emma Brannigan, the tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £409 for unlawful deduction of wages, £396.48 for unpaid annual leave, and a net sum of £305.92 for failure to give notice, producing a total award of £1,111.40. For Rhys Brannigan, the tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £337.60 for unlawful deduction of wages, £330.85 for unpaid annual leave, and a net sum of £334.33 for failure to give notice, producing a total award of £1,002.78.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No separate findings beyond the success of the three heads of claim and the specific monetary awards were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Emma Brannigan: gross sum awarded for unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £409 |
| Working time regulations | Emma Brannigan: gross sum awarded for unpaid annual leave under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £396 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Emma Brannigan: net sum awarded for failure to give notice (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £306 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rhys Brannigan: gross sum awarded for unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Working time regulations | Rhys Brannigan: gross sum awarded for unpaid annual leave under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £331 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Rhys Brannigan: net sum awarded for failure to give notice (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,114
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.