Case 2500806/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Grainger v Golden Chef 2 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500806/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Grainger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment, not a merits decision on the underlying claims. The Employment Tribunal recorded that the respondent, Golden Chef 2 Ltd, had not complied with paragraphs 3, 5 and 7 of the Tribunal's order dated 30 July 2020.
By letter dated 9 November 2020, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the response was struck out.
The judgment also stated that the respondent would be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by Employment Judge Martin. No substantive remedy, liability finding, or award is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying pleaded claims; it strikes out the respondent's response for non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.