Case 2500812/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Russell v First Source Solutions UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500812/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms C Hunter, Ms E Wiles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Russell brought claims against First Source Solutions Limited that were heard at the Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre on 19 to 21 April 2021 before Employment Judge Johnson, with Ms C Hunter and Ms E Wiles as members. The respondent was represented by Mr R Dunn of Counsel and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal unanimously dismissed both claims. The complaint of unlawful disability discrimination under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, described as unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, was found not well-founded and dismissed. The complaint of unlawful disability discrimination based on failure to make reasonable adjustments was also found not well-founded and dismissed.
The judgment does not record any monetary award, and no remedy was ordered. The written reasons extracted here state the outcomes only and do not set out further factual findings or a separate damages assessment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unlawful disability discrimination: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, contrary to section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unlawful disability discrimination: failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
- reasonable adjustments duty
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.