Case 2500816/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Martin v Cleveland Cable Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500816/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Miss B Kirby, Mrs P Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Middlesbrough before Employment Judge Aspden with Miss B Kirby and Mrs P Wright, recorded a unanimous judgment in Mr E Martin's claim against Cleveland Cable Company Limited. It held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments was well founded, and that the complaint that the respondent subjected the claimant to disability discrimination within section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 by dismissing him was also well founded.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning, because it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. It therefore records only the dispositive outcomes, not the factual or legal analysis leading to them.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's other complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. No monetary remedy is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint that the respondent discriminated against the claimant by failing to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint that the respondent subjected the claimant to disability discrimination within s15 of the Equality Act 2010 by dismissing him. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not well founded, but the written record does not identify those complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- duty to make reasonable adjustments
- s15 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.