Case 2500824/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Matthews v Time To Care Specialist Support Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500824/2019
- Decision date
- 25 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Matthews
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs D Matthews presented a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Time To Care Specialist Support Services Limited. Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 17 June 2019, but no response was presented within the time allowed. On the information before Employment Judge Shepherd Date, the tribunal treated the claim as succeeding under Rule 21.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £1,833.33 to the claimant. The sum was described as gross, and the claimant was stated to be responsible for any tax or national insurance on it. The judgment does not split the award into separate heads of loss or record any additional remedy beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The claimant presented a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. No response was presented by the respondent, and the tribunal ordered payment of £1,833.33 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,833
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.