Case 2500828/2022 · Employment Tribunal
F Carney v Testerworld Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500828/2022
- Decision date
- 29 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F Carney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge considered the complaint could be determined on the available material. The respondent's administrators had consented to the claim continuing.
The tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Low Prudhoe Industrial Estate, Prudhoe depot/site, and that the claimant was one of the affected employees. The claimant was dismissed as redundant on 17 June 2022.
The tribunal found there was no recognised independent trade union for the claimant's employee description, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes. The respondent had not invited the affected employees to elect such representatives, had failed to comply with section 188, and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. The tribunal made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days from 17 June 2022, finding there had been no consultation and no mitigating circumstances.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements; protective award ordered for 90 days' remuneration, but no monetary amount was quantified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1)
- section 292A
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.