Case 2500833/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dunham v Counter Security Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500833/2021
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dunham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers. The claimant, Mr J Dunham, made a written representation and the respondent, Counter Security Services Limited, did not file a response.
The tribunal held that the claimant's section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim for unauthorised deduction of wages or unpaid holiday pay was well-founded. On that basis, the respondent was ordered to pay £500.00.
The award was described as a net award, with the respondent liable to the Inland Revenue for any tax and national insurance payments on it. The judgment records a total award of £500.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as one under section 13 ERA 1996 for 'the unauthorised deduction of wages or unpaid holiday pay'. The tribunal found it well-founded and awarded £500 net. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.