Case 2500850/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr PB Freer (1) Miss M Lofts (2) v Mr N Hadlett — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500850/2021
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr PB Freer (1) Miss M Lofts (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Morris, sitting alone, found on the balance of probabilities that Mr Hadlett was the employer of both claimants. He rejected the copy written particulars of employment produced by Mr Hadlett as not genuine and accepted the claimants' evidence that they had not been given written contracts or statements of particulars. The tribunal also relied on the parties' actual dealings, including messages and pay documents that referred to The Bottled Note rather than The Bottled Note Ltd, in concluding that the true agreement was that Mr Hadlett was the employer.
On the wages claims, the tribunal accepted the time-sheet and text-message evidence showing that Mr Freer worked 110.5 hours between 12 April and 8 May 2021 and Miss Lofts worked 76 hours between 15 April and 16 May 2021, both at £8.21 per hour. It rejected Mr Hadlett's case that the wages had already been paid and rejected his reliance on alleged outstanding loans or drinks tabs, because no written consent to deductions had been produced. The tribunal found both claimants had suffered unauthorised deductions contrary to section 13 ERA 1996 and awarded £907.21 to Mr Freer and £623.96 to Miss Lofts.
For Miss Lofts' holiday pay claim, the tribunal found that her leave year ran from 20 December 2020 because no valid written leave-year provision was proved, that she took no paid holiday before her employment ended on 18 May 2021, and that she had not been compensated for accrued but untaken leave. It held that Regulation 14 WTR 1998 entitled her to £677.16 in lieu of untaken holiday. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, the tribunal added four weeks' pay to each claimant's award, namely £907.20 for Mr Freer and £546.00 for Miss Lofts, making total sums of £1,814.41 and £1,847.12 respectively.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for 110.5 hours at £8.21 per hour. The tribunal then added a separate section 38 Employment Act 2002 uplift to the overall award. | Upheld | — | £907 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for 76 hours at £8.21 per hour. The tribunal then added a separate section 38 Employment Act 2002 uplift to the overall award. | Upheld | — | £624 |
| Holiday pay | Payment in lieu of untaken leave on termination under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal then added a separate section 38 Employment Act 2002 uplift to the overall award. | Upheld | — | £677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,662
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
10 references- balance of probabilities
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.1 ERA 1996
- Regulation 14 WTR 1998
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- Clark v Harney Westwood & Riegels
- Clifford v Union of Democratic Mineworkers
- Secretary of State for Education and Employment v Bearman
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
- Dynasystems for Trade and General Consulting Ltd v Moseley
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.