Case 2500860/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kilvington v PF Burridge & Sons Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500860/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson RULE
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kilvington
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Johnson, sitting alone in a Rule 21 judgment, found that the respondent had failed to comply with a requirement of section 188 or section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The complaint was therefore well-founded and the claimant was entitled to a protective award.
The judgment states that remuneration is to be paid to the claimant personally for the protected period, which was identified as 17 March 2020 to 14 June 2020 inclusive. It does not set out a monetary figure in the extracted text.
The judgment also notes that the Employment Protection (Recruitment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply. It records that regulation 6 imposes a duty to provide information to the Secretary of State, and that regulations 7 and 8 postpone the award to enable the Secretary of State to serve a recruitment notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment records that the complaint under section 188 or section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded. It orders remuneration under section 190 for the protected period, but no numeric sum is set out in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
- section 190 TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recruitment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
- regulations 6, 7 and 8
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.